You may think that SS is not true. However, because there are different definitions of it,

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Display

#571   Today, 2:01 pm

Nicea325 Senior Member   Join Date: March 16, 2010 Posts: 6,481 Religion: Catholic

Re: Sola Scriptura... Quote: Originally Posted by Per Crucem You may think that SS is not true. However, because there are different definitions of it, does not prove that it is not true. That's just bad argumentation. Because Presbyterians and Lutherans define SS differently. SS is false. Because Catholics and Orthodox define the RP differently, the RP is false. Because Catholics and Orthodox define the infallibility of the Church differently, the infallibility of the Church is false. etc. etc. What is good for one, is good for the other. Sorry,but I don't have to think anything, SS is false. From a historical perspective, it is false. I can go and and on. If SS is not false,strange how not one ECF has ever defended it as a sound principle,doctrine,method. What is good for one, is good for the other is a mere cop-out. Relativism will not cut it. Sorry. SS advocates are just trying to place SS at the same level with the Real Presence and trying to justify it.